Admittedly literary people are such lazybones, sluggish to a point. They may be society’s most sensitive lot as they often boast in their writings and may not be that thick skinned that they appear to be to the unlettered pedestrians but, oftenest, their silence on urgent issues — even to those who suffer through their writings and can even quote a verse or two — is puzzling to say the least, if not dubious, as some of us like to believe. They have been heard saying in their defence that they are writers and their presence at protest rallies is not required because their weapon is their pen, which is not always at their beck and call and possesses a temperament and will of its own. They can’t budge unless it wiggles.
The issues that agitate the common people, they say, take time to stir their creative response which may take a month or a year to show up when the provocations have ultimately condensed into liquid form and can filter through the fog of their minds to fall on their heads in a steady stream. And they start wondering what that might be till it dawns on them it’s inspiration, the creative itch. So they get up and seize the pen and make a metaphor of the forgotten event that, subsequently, it would fall to the lot of some critic to unravel at a function in their memory at the Academy of Letters. No wonder they taunt journalists for doing their job.
It is also held by most that they have all the freedom they need to do their creative work. No controls of any kind can be applied on thought and imagination. Externalities that seem to constrain others place no restraints on them, except perhaps the winter chill that prevents them from venturing out. Moreover there is no such thing as intellectual activism as there has been the judicial kind. If there were it would be thrown out by an ignorant society just as an unjust milieu has shut up its justices. Then discretion, as all know, is the better part of valour. It is not courage that they lack but stupidity that sent some good souls recently to spend uncomfortable nights in the Adiala reformatory. They, the agitators, may have made a point and shown their commitment to freedom, liberty, justice and democracy but did that made any impression anywhere, the writers ask. Those nights spent on hard floors and that atrocious food served from dirty buckets ruffled nobody’s sleep in the power palaces or spoiled anybody’s appetite.
The writers and poets do not contest the charge of lethargy and indolence against them and they wouldn’t mind if another Jalib appeared on the literary scene. But such things do not happen on order. The general lot of the poets and writers and scholars comprises men of gentle, milder disposition. They would think it would be rude if they refused an invitation to discuss things over dinner. When Gen Ziaul Haque threw such an invitation to writers, poets and intellectuals the rush at the Islamabad Hotel was worth watching. Tottering men flew in from Karachi. Were there any who declined? I don’t remember. Republicans and revolutionaries all made a beeline.
Friends who were shocked or dismayed to see good old Munno Bhai in a TV show sharing silly jokes and innuendos with a giggling Naeem Bukhari, who desperately needs such help in his social rehabilitation, tend to ignore the broad humanity, godly understanding and compassion that great writers, particularly playwrights, possess. Yet if that amounted to appeasement perhaps Munno Bhai in this instance was being indiscreet and being too lenient for the sake of his folksy affability to permit risking his name as a voice of resistance against despots, charlatans and imposters.
It is not that this eminent group of what we call the civil society has not raised its voice. Resolutions by literary bodies have been published and some writers and scholars have come out in their individual capacity as well. One of the most effective, eloquent and convincing voice that was unfortunately not heeded was that of our friend Javed Jabbar who was among the earliest to part ways with a company that was getting too crowded with sycophants, self-serving counsellors and turncoats.
Sixty years have gone down the drain. Once put on the wrong track the train without a driver must complete its run to the terminal, wherever that may be. When Faiz was asked how long the situation was going to last he had quipped, ‘forever’. “Yeh aise hi chalta rahega”. Or some thing to that effect. The depth of the fall was never so deep and the position for anyone to take sides never so clear. There are no grey areas now. A sharp and clear line separates the black from the white. Time, if one wanted one could get up and be counted. If it is cold outside that’s one thing; but getting cold feet is quite another.