Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

January 25, 2007 Thursday Muharram 05, 1428





There is no war on terror: UK official


LONDON, Jan 24: Britain’s top prosecutor set himself at odds with Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government saying the `war on terror’ does not exist and urging restraint on laws threatening human rights.

The director of public prosecutions, Ken Macdonald, warned of a “fear-driven and inappropriate response” to the new threat that could lead to the abandonment of respect for fair trials and due legal process.

In a speech to the Criminal Bar Association, reported by the Guardian newspaper, Macdonald rejected the assertion that a “war on terror” was being played out in Britain.

“On the streets of London, there is no such thing as a 'war on terror', just as there can be no such thing as a 'war on drugs', said Macdonald, who heads the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

“The fight against terrorism on the streets of Britain is not a war. It is the prevention of crime, the enforcement of our laws and the winning of justice for those damaged by the infringement.” One of the primary aims of groups and individuals who committed atrocities such as the July 2005 suicide bombings in London was to encourage a response that ran counter to British values, he added.

Since the bombings -- and even after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States -- there have been criticisms that anti-terrorism legislation unfairly targets British Muslims.

Blair has tried -- and failed -- to increase the maximum period of detention without charge for security suspects to 90 days, while detention without trial -- the government's response to September 11 -- was ruled unlawful.

The courts have also criticised an alternative system of “control orders”-- a loose form of house arrest for security suspects -- as incompatible with human rights laws.

Macdonald said a “culture of legislative restraint in the area of terrorist crime is central to the existence of an efficient and human rights compatible process”.—AFP






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007