KARACHI, Jan 8: The Sindh High Court asked the petitioners occupying land required for the construction of the Lyari Expressway project on Monday to vacate it by the first week of February.

About 22 people had moved a petition through Advocate Ghulam Qadir Jatoi complaining that their plots were being acquired for the expressway project without compensation.

They claimed that they were lawful sub-lessees of the plots and requested the court to restrain the city district government and the expressway project not to evict them from their property without payment of compensation at the market rate.

Contesting the petition, city government counsel Manzoor Ahmed submitted that 11 of the petitioners had already been compensated in accordance with an order passed and formula laid down by the high court while disposing of a number of identical petitions in 2002.

He said the petitioners had failed to produce any document whatsoever evidencing their title to the property in question.

In the absence of any lease or sub-lease they could only be treated as illegal occupants and encroachers yet the city government has paid them compensation in terms of the high court order.

A division bench comprising Justices Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Sajjad Ali Shah asked the city government to dispose of all applications for compensation in accordance with law as directed by the court in its order of 2002.

The issue of inadequacy of compensation would be decided in due course but the petitioners must vacate the land by the first week of February as ‘sufficient time has already lapsed’.

BAIL GRANTED: Justice Saiyed Zawwar Hussain Jaffery, meanwhile, granted bail to two accused booked under Section 22 (b) of the Emigration Ordinance in the sum of Rs200,000 each.

Complainant Abu Ubaida of Lahore lodged an FIR alleging that accused Farrukh Mehmood Janjua and Sajid Ali Mughal deprived him of lakhs of rupees for arranging a Malaysian visa and job.

The Federal Investigation Agency investigated the complaint and found that the accused were not authorized overseas employment promoters and were fleecing people by making false promises.

Appearing for the applicant accused, Advocate Mohammad Ali Abbassi argued that the FIR was lodged 10 months after the alleged payment.

Besides, his clients were abroad at the time when the payment was allegedly made to them in Pakistan.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...