Lara's men pay dearly for poor bowling, fielding
By Sohaib Alvi
It was another grey day, and a greyer one for West Indies. Coming from the land of glorious beaches and sunsets, they were faced here with a beachhead and no sun and the situation for them is, well, greyer than the first day.
While it was Lara's batsmen who let him down on the opening day, it was his fielders and bowlers who disappointed on the second. They were, of course, gifted a wicket early through the rising eccentricism of Younis Khan who is fast eroding the maturity he has gained through the year.
Some will say that's the way he plays which is wrong. The developing batsman is one who adapts his strokes to the pitch and then, whatever the pitch, doesn't go for such strokes in the first 30 minutes of the day's play. That is the only element that is stopping him from being ranked alongside Inzamam and Yousuf, and with Miandad from days past.
It was ironic that Yousuf replaced him and displayed what Younis should have been doing. His batting yesterday was the finest personification of his Patron's Enlightened Moderation. He cut and drove skillfully but with some daring thrown in and if the fielders had been apprised of his conversion rate from 50s to 100s, Ganga would have been sharper at gully and followed the coach's age old instruction to the close in fielders: Don't rise too soon, lad.
Yousuf's year of conversion to the Islamic faith has also given him one of the highest conversion rates for a batsman in a calendar year — two half centuries (one of them 97) to six hundreds. What is still not too late for the calypso's to gather is his conversion rate from century to 150 plus which is also quite impressive considering scores of 173, 202 and 192 and those of 126 (run out) and 128. Altogether, he now has 1230 runs in 2006 at almost 100 per innings!!
It was pleasing to see Malik dig in and if it wasn't for Yousuf he would have carried the accolades. He scored a hundred in his previous Test innings in Sri Lanka and could repeat it here seeing the dedication with which he is batting. He too was a fusion of aggression and rock solid defense. His straight driving was above par. Pakistan have their all rounder at No.6.
Woolmer must be kicking himself for not bringing in Hafeez earlier in his tenure. He has shown all the true grit and the will to stay at the wicket that the coach has yearned for. Yesterday, one could see the focus in his eyes. He could not hide his shortcoming in technique but he makes up for it with guts. Can't remember the last time a Pakistani opener scored back-to-back half centuries. He got 95 at the Oval and, remember, never got to bat in the second innings because of a private quarrel.
The last time Inzy made a comeback to the team in 2003, he also got a duck. Don't you wish you'd bet on it. I'm sure someone did and is laughing all the way to the bank by now.
Despite seeing that from close up, I felt Lara lost the plot on the second day. He should have bowled more spin. The ball is not coming on to the bat and his medium pacers are all of the same type. Dave Mohammad was the pick and was underbowled with 12 overs out of 76 delivered on Sunday.
Even my driver agrees and he insists on calling him Deen Mohammad. But Deen or Dave, he was very, very brave. It was delightful to see a spinner toss 'em after a long time. That he did to Inzamam spoke of his courage - and self belief. It paid off with Inzamam playing inside the line but to the bowler's credit, it curled in to castle the king himself.
I feel if Lara had not changed him with Gayle, it would have been more rewarding. He should have also delayed the new ball and got his spinners to bowl at both ends to avoid giving the batsmen the option to walk off for bad light. West Indies desperately needed a late wicket to stay in the game.


Some Muslims are missing, give or take a few million
By Jawed Naqvi
IF Muslims constitute 13.4 per cent of India's population of just over one billion, as is officially acknowledged, there should be 134 millionof them in the country. But the Saudi king who recently visited India estimated the country's Muslim population to be 150 million. Other independent estimates come close to the Saudi version. There was no official correction, if one was required, to the royal claim made on Indian TV. Which means there could be 15 per cent Muslims in India and not 13.4. Nations that care for their own are not so wayward in counting their citizens.
The entire population of Sri Lanka is 19.7 million, including 7 per cent Muslims. At least Sri Lankan Muslims know precisely how many they are. The staggering "clerical error" surrounding more than 15 million people would be a raging scandal in any part of the world save India.
Whether they are 134 million or 150 million of them, the Sachar Committee set up by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to investigate the deplorable condition of India's minorities, says Muslims rank today lower than the erstwhile untouchable caste of Dalits in terms of education, job opportunities and other key indices. With such a huge margin of purported error it is strange that the Sachar Committee has come with statistics in terms of percentages of Muslim drop outs from school and so on. Be that as it may, the nub of the problem – social problems, and not gaping arithmetical errors -- lies elsewhere.
Dalit leader Ms. Mayawati has accused Muslims of being in a sorry state because they tend to follow obscurantist community leaders. No one can deny that Mayawati is an enlightened Dalit leader. But her criticism of Muslims is only half of their story. The truth is that since the days of Mahatma Gandhi, if not earlier, the Congress party, India's political behemoth, has, for reasons of its own, bred obscurantism among Muslims. It's tedious to recall, but how can we live down Mahatma Gandhi's campaign for the Khilafat Movement, a mediaeval institution that moderate Turks were fighting against but Indian Muslims were being mobilized to demand its protection. In a more recent context, during the crisis thrown up by a Muslim divorcee's case for alimony the Congress government, headed by the genial Rajiv Gandhi, overturned a secular verdict on the issue by the Supreme Court. And thus the Shahbano case became the rallying point for right wing Hindus against alleged Muslim appeasement. What this appeasement has fetched for the poor minorities is part of the story that the Sachar report seeks to tell. The answer is, untold misery.
Mayawati is right that Muslims are increasingly leaning on fanatical leaders. That's But what happened when liberal Muslims approached then Congress leader Rajiv Gandhi to stall his move in parliament to overturn a secular court verdict in the Shahbano case? "It's nice to meet so many liberal Muslims," Rajiv had exulted with a characteristic warm smile. His Brahman law minister H.R. Bhardwaj, who advised him on the disastrous Ayodhya mosque strategy, was ensconced at a whispering distance from him. "I acknowledge you have a major role to play in welding the country into a cohesive nation. But the Shahbano matter should be tackled by the Muslim Personal Law Board. I would urge you to use your influence with their leaders to consider a change in their approach." This is what Rajiv had told a small group of visitors consisting of a galaxy of Indian Muslims, including writers, film-makers, theatre personalities, journalists and women activists.
The right wing Muslim press, on cue from the law board, promptly dubbed the meeting as one of "nachaniyas and gavayyas" (dancers and bards). And that was the end of the liberal effort to advise the supposedly secular government on the community's affairs.
With Hindu revivalist groups making up the main opposition to the Congress, political options before India's Muslims have been reduced to a toss-up between a rock and a hard place. Some of the progressive Muslim supporters of the Congress party trooped out recently to join the BJP. That these people have remained loyal to Hindu revivalist opposition even after its government in Gujarat unleashed an orgy of massacre and rape against the state's Muslims speaks volumes for the dire straits the Muslim leadership finds itself in. BJP's menagerie of Muslims include former minister Arif Mohammed Khan and the former deputy chairperson of the Rajya Sabha, Najma Heptullah both formerly with the Congress and now firmly parked with the BJP. These Muslim supporters of the BJP are quick to point out that the Congress seeks Muslim votes and not their welfare. Part of the explanation rests with the coterie that surrounds and advises Congress president Sonia Gandhi as it did her husband. The fact that Sonia was prevented from visiting the home of a former Congress MP who was cut into pieces and burnt by a mob in Gujarat is cited as an example of the party's increasing core thrust towards the Hindu right, a far cry from the Nehruvian vision it had set out to implement in free India.
It is this basic vision that more than anything needs to be restored to implement a respectable strategy for India's Muslims. As of now the task looks well nigh impossible for a country that is finding it difficult to raise the required six percent of the GDP for educating its school-age children, including the children of 134 or so million Muslim community. So far the government has been merrily looking the other way as funds to educate a substantial chunk of population are outsourced through the medrassah system to far away country's such as Saudi Arabia. By handing over millions of Muslim children to the care of the usually secretive and often obscurantist medrassahs, the Indian government is able to save a substantial sum of the educational budget, but at what cost. It comes as a surprise therefore that suddenly one day it orders a Sachar Committee to throw up details and suggest solutions to the problem. To be fair to the quest this exercise was carried out even earlier, 26 years ago to be precise, by Indira Gandhi. So there's little that is new in the Sachar report.
In broad strokes the report shows that 13.4 per cent Muslims (that's the figure now arrived at from the 2001 census) contribute just 6 per cent of the GDP.
Across 12 states with an average Muslim population of 15.4 per cent, only 6.4 per cent of government employees are Muslim. In 15 states where Muslims average 17 per cent of the population, they are 8 per cent of the lower judiciary, which decides eight out of every 10 cases in the country. But prison is one place where Muslims' proportional representation is higher than their population percentage. In eight states where they average 14.82 per cent of the population, they account for 23.4 per cent of prison inmates. Although Muslims in jails were not part of the Sachar Committee's terms of reference, prison is the only place where they have been found to be over-represented.
Former MP Syed Shahabuddin has compared the present condition of the Indian Muslim to that of blacks in the United States — an analogy once reserved only for Dalits. Ironically, Syed Shahabuddin was the key campaigner for Muslim leaders who forced Rajiv Gandhi to make a law that was to send their women into the medieval era. Is this the raw material that the country has to work with to pull the Muslims out of the deepening quagmire? In which case let's accept the margin of error of a few million Muslims missing here and there. The bigger error is in the attitude, forget the numbers.
*****
We have heard of religious mendicants praying for rain. In the parched rain-deficient Gulf states, their rulers have led prayers for rain.
Only in India would you find farmers who pray desperately for their land to be spared the generosity of the rain-gods. Farmers in the region of River Noyyal in Tamil Nadu too look up at the sky and listen to weather forecasts. But this is neither for bountiful rain nor for dams to fill up fast. The prayers are for rains to stop so that the neighbouring dam bed remains dry. Farmers say they do not want rain because it brings in polluted water, carrying effluents that dyeing and bleaching units in Tirupur discharge into the river. They also refuse to carry out farming using the water.
jawednaqvi@gmail.com


