Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather


FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

September 01, 2006 Friday Sha'aban 7, 1427

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




CJP defends rights of the weak



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, Aug 31: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry asked the judiciary to augment its capacity and utilise all available resources to its optimal level to protect rights of the weak and down-trodden.

“Family and child issues lie at the core of the social problems of any society and the weaker segments of the society should be protected with care,” a statement issued here quoted CJP as saying.

The CJP was speaking at the 17th World Congress organized by “The International Association Of Youth and Family Judges and Magistrates” on the topic “Family and youth issues: Pakistan perspective” at Belfast, Northern Ireland.

Justice Chaudhry recalled that on January 15, 2003 the then chief justice of Pakistan and the President of the family division of the High Court of England and Wales had signed a protocol on family and child issues to protect the child from abduction by parent from the territories of one country to another. “Ever since the signing of the protocol, the judiciaries of the two countries maintain a regular liaison through exchange of visits and other means,” he said.

This helps in ensuring follow up action on the protocol and expedite decision of applications for return of children wrongfully removed from one country to the other on the assumption that in the normal circumstances the welfare of a child is best determined by the court of the country of the child’s habitual/ordinary residence, he observed.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006