G8 leaders under pressure to change rhetoric into reality
By Shadaba Islam
BRUSSELS: Leaders from the world’s most powerful economies meet in Scotland early July for a much-publicized effort to ease poverty in Africa.
Members of the Group of Eight (G8) are being pressed to turn their pro-African rhetoric into reality by an unprecedented coalition of development agencies, rock stars and celebrities who say the world’s rich nations must give more aid to poor countries, relieve Africa’s massive foreign debt burden and improve the continent’s trading prospects.
Combating climate change is also high on the summit agenda.
About a million aid activists are expected to flock to Edinburgh during the meeting to lobby G8 leaders. Few are expecting a major breakthrough, however.
Advocacy groups point out that G8 summits have always been strong on grand-standing but mostly failed to deliver on trade or aid. Even a ground-setting decision by G8 finance ministers to write off 40 billion dollars (33 billion euros) worth of debt owed by 18 African states is full of loopholes, say aid specialists.
The prospect of words turning to action is even grimmer this time around because almost all G8 leaders, from the US, Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia, face an array of domestic problems likely to distract them from focusing on Africa’s plight.
US President George W. Bush’s second term has got off to a shaky start, with many in America losing patience over Iraq and calling for US troops to be brought back home.
The resounding rejection of the first-ever EU constitution by French voters has further weakened the domestic standing of French President Chirac, German opposition leader Angela Merkel is breathing down the neck of the embattled Gerhard Schroeder and the jailing of YUKOS boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky as well as the continuing war in Chechnya have cast a dark cloud over Russian President Vladimir Putin’s democratic credentials.
Meanwhile Junichiro Koizumi’s long-standing claim to represent Asia in the G8 looks increasingly lame given the rising power of China whose President Hu Jintao has been invited to Gleneagles.
In addition, relations between EU leaders remain tense following the recent ill-fated EU budget summit, with French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder blaming the debacle on British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s refusal to consider a change in the British budget rebate without cuts in EU farm spending.
Blair, in turn, has accused the two men of seeking to hold back change and modernization in Europe. Britain is also arguing that further reform of the common agriculture policy will help African countries to export more of their products to Europe and stop cheap EU food from being dumped on African markets. Britain wants the EU to abolish export subsidies within five years, without demanding tit-for-tat concessions from poor countries, at this year’s critical World Trade Organization talks.
Even more crucially, preparations for the meeting reveal a still-wide gap between the US and other members on issues such as global warming. Aid advocacy groups also fear that G8 leaders will once again put politics ahead of economics and allow the Gleneagles meeting to be dominated by issues such as Iran’s nuclear programme, Syria’s alleged encouragement of Iraqi guerillas, the North Korean nuclear crisis and the activities of Zimbabwe’s erratic leader Robert Mugabe.
There is no lack of initiatives, however. Britain has called for a doubling of aid to the poorest countries by issuing bonds using rich nations’ future development budgets as collateral. But the so-called International Finance Facility is being cold-shouldered by Washington.
The US is also expected to turn a deaf ear to French proposal for a tax on international air tickets to fund the fights against Aids and poverty in Africa. Chirac said the debt-cancellation agreement by G8 finance ministers was not enough. The EU has approved the idea of a small tax on domestic flights within Europe to raise at least 560 million euros (680 million dollars) a year for development. Chirac hopes to see that measure widened through an acceptance by all the G8 states.
Meanwhile, African leaders who met recently in Nigeria have asked G8 countries to set up a new 20 billion dollar fund, to be managed by the multilateral African Development Bank, to finance projects in agriculture, health, water, sanitation and education.
The scheme would be part of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) rescue plan which was hammered out by African leaders ahead of the G8 meeting in Genoa in 2001. African governments are also calling on the G8 to commit to increased long-term funding for African Union peacekeeping.
A recent report by ActionAid warns, however, that ‘G8 leaders have used previous summits to make grand speeches about waging war on poverty. But on past evidence, they are firing blanks’.
The Toronto-based G8 Research Group is equally pessimistic about the summit. It says that so far only Britain and Canada have funded an organization called the African Peer Review Mechanism, under which African states are encouraged to ensure peace and order.
The recent debt-cancellation deal covers only one-sixth of Africa’s $300 billion external debt and only includes 18 African states, many of which are comparatively small and none of which can be described as economic engines on the continent.

