Advani’s remarks
BY paying tribute to Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Mr L.K. Advani was merely completing the process started by Mr A. B. Vajpayee who had earlier visited Minar-i-Pakistan in Lahore. When two adversaries decide to bury the hatchet, they have to take several steps, one of which must be mutual respect for national feelings as regards their history and leaders. Mr Advani has shown due respect for the founder of Pakistan, which is essential for mutual confidence.
He has also corrected historical distortions. It was not Mr Jinnah who had caused the partition of India; it was the Congress leaders, both hardliners and moderates, who repeatedly refused to take into consideration the ground realities by rejecting Muslim pleas for redressing their apprehensions about the future constitutional setup. It was Mr Jawaharlal Nehru who violated the agreed Lucknow pact and, more damagingly, reneged on his acceptance of the Cabinet Mission Plan.
Mr Jinnah was rightly called the “Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity” and was disillusioned only when mystical and religious humbug was introduced by Mr M. K. Gandhi in Congress policies which were being influenced by obscurantists like Tandon and Malviya. In a way, Mr Advani has indirectly criticized both Mr Gandhi and Mr Nehru and in doing so, he has laid a solid foundation for long lasting rapprochement between the two communities. This criticism has naturally irked the Congress leadership which (and not a Hindu religious party) was in power during the 1965 and 1971 wars.
F.H. ANSARI
Karachi

