Commerce minister Humayun Akhtar Khan has assured exporters that the quota crisis arising from a US embargo on fast running categories has finally been resolved. The US authorities have also made some allowances in this regard.
To blame for this crisis is the Export Promotion Bureau, which had not been properly reconciling the utilization of quota over the past couple of years. As a consequence, the Americans imposed an embargo on a number of categories of Pakistani exports last month.
This mistake has cost the country dearly. Estimates indicate that exports worth $50 million would suffer as a result of the mix-up. In addition, the government has said that it would be spending over Rs500 million to ensure that goods are speedily shipped under the quota regime before the end of the year.
While these steps should be appreciated, one wonders what should be done to make the EPB more responsive to the exigencies of exporters. Given that the EPB collects millions of rupees under the Export Development Fund from exporters besides receiving funding from the federal government, there is no dearth of resources that the organization can complain of.
The problem lies with the competence of the staff employed to run the bureau despite the fact that over the past couple of years, the chief executives of the EPB have all been taken from the private sector.
Given that the prime minister has announced plans to boost Pakistan exports in the coming three to five years to about $20 billion, it is important for the EPB to get its house in order.
A bigger challenge around the corner is the commencement of the quota-free regime for exports from January 2005. In this, the question that needs to be asked is how prepared the country is for the new situation.
For Pakistan to hold its own in competitive world market, it has not only to understand how these changes will affect its textile exports in terms of quality and price. This will be an issue that the EPB should take up at once.
A correct step
The government is reported to be ready to go ahead with its decision to delete the religion column from the new machine-readable passports. The interior minister told a news conference the other day that there was no reason for soliciting information from applicants because all such details had already been recorded at the time when they had applied for computerized national ID cards.
Since a CNIC is a prerequisite for receiving the new passports, it makes little sense to ask people again about their religion. The minister also explained that many other Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, did not have such a column on their passports.
As expected, the religious right, led by the Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal, has come out against this deletion and threatened a countrywide agitation. The NWFP chief minister has also joined the fray, demanding that the interior ministry reverse its decision.
The MMA's chief concern seems to be that such decisions are part of a policy to 'secularize' Pakistani society. It is also said that this might allow Pakistani Qadianis to travel to Saudi Arabia for pilgrimage.
The same kind of bigotry is evident in the religious right's vociferous criticism of the government's decision to allow the Aga Khan University to establish its own private examination board.
The fact of the matter is that the decision in based on common sense and established practice. No country asks its citizens to declare their religion when applying for a travel document.
It should not be a state's business to quiz its citizens about their religious persuasion in relation the travel documents. Such information in relevant only for sociological or demographic purposes.