Annan-bashing is now the latest fad. With Yasser Arafat dead, the UN secretary-general is America's latest bete noire. Till now, it is the American press and Congress which have been demonizing Mr Kofi Annan; it is, however, for the first that President George Bush has joined the anti-Annan chorus.
Talking to newsmen at the White House on Thursday, Mr Bush called for "a full and fair and open" probe into the oil-for-food programme in which Washington has detected corruption.
Even though this programme has been in existence in Iraq since the end of the Kuwait war, Annan-bashers have discovered corruption in it now. However, what has triggered Annan-baiting is his stance on Iraq.
The UN secretary-general did not stand up to the world's only superpower when it was planning Iraq's invasion without a UN authorization. Lately, however, Mr Annan has been somewhat candid. First, he said that the Iraq war was illegal; next, he followed this up by saying that the war on Iraq had not made the world any safer.
Then he seemed to register a protest against America's monopolization of oil-rich Iraq by saying that the world body had not been involved in the post-war scenario, especially with regard to the proposed election.
He also warned that an all-out attack on Fallujah would cause bloodshed, and this could upset the election schedule. All this was obviously too much for Washington, where the only voice of sanity, Secretary of State Colin Powell, is on his way out. Now Mr Annan's son, too, is being accused of corruption.
Fortunately, the vast majority of UN members are with the secretary-general. That is one reason why Mr Bush did not call for Mr Annan's resignation - a demand made by the chairman of the Senate committee investigating the case.
In office now for eight years, Mr Annan has been, relatively speaking, a more forceful UN chief than his predecessor - Mr Boutros Boutros-Ghali. America would do well to listen to him and try to correct itself rather than attempt to undermine Mr Annan's moral position - a crusade in which it has little support among the UN members.
Illegal radio stations
The existence of five FM radio stations broadcasting in FATA's Khyber Agency without government permission, and reportedly airing extremist and sectarian views, is cause for concern.
According to a report, the local authorities in the agency have been turning a blind eye to the presence of these channels, which have been used by rival groups to launch propaganda against each other.
The appearance of these radio stations comes amidst reports that groups of local tribesmen have set up illegal check posts in the agency to collect toll from vehicles bringing in smuggled goods from Afghanistan.
Those living in the tribal agencies are known for their independence and are governed directly from Islamabad. However, this should not mean that they be allowed unchecked to indulge in activities that fuel sectarianism or incite others to resort to violence as a method to impose their religious views and notions on others.
Those behind the radio stations are justifying their activities by saying that they are only broadcasting programmes on religious matters. In fact, they have managed to enlist the support of college students who say that any move to close down the broadcasts will be fiercely resisted.
The authorities will hopefully know that to ignore the presence of these illegal FM stations will encourage other like-minded obscurantist elements to start transmissions of their own, to spread their own brand of politico-religious views.
In fact, one wonders why, despite reports in the past (when only one FM station was broadcasting), the government failed to act, knowing fully well that parts of the tribal areas are a haven for remnants of the Taliban and all kinds of other retrogressive elements.
Before this disturbing trend snowballs into a full fledged war of contention and mutual denigration in the air in a highly sensitive area of the country, the government should act swiftly to close down all illegal FM stations.