If the government is to be believed, then in the past week alone it has notched up two successes in the war against terror. First, Asim Ghafoor, a member of a banned extremist organization who carried a reward of half a million rupees, was killed in a police encounter in Karachi.
He is described as a close associate of Amjad Farooqui, who also died in a somewhat mysterious police encounter in Nawabshah in September. According to the police, both Ghafoor and Farooqui were involved in several high-profile cases, including the attacks on the president and the prime minister and the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl. Then, Naveedul Hassan, a suspect in the bombing of the US consulate in Karachi, has been detained by law-enforcement agencies, reportedly at the Wagah border.
These developments remain shrouded in mystery. Details of Naveed's arrest are sketchy, with some reports suggesting he was arrested elsewhere. As for Ghafoor, the official version is that he died in a shootout following a raid to arrest him.
The murder of two prime suspects in the Daniel Pearl case in encounters in a space of three months is itself a little intriguing. There have been several newspaper reports in the past suggesting that Omar Saeed Sheikh, the main accused in the case and whom a court eventually sentenced to death, was not Pearl's actual killer or even the mastermind of the plot.
The capture of such high-value suspects could have provided the authorities with a wealth of information regarding terror groups. While all information about anti-terror operations, understandably, cannot be made public, claims about arrests and shootouts should come in a way that establishes the credibility of government actions. Perhaps the interior minister should hold a comprehensive briefing to inform the public of the precise progress made so far in the crackdown on terrorists or militants.
Power on war footing
It makes much sense to install additional power generation units for Karachi on a war footing. According to the Karachi Electric Supply Corporation, the city faces a shortfall of 600 megawatts and this is one of the major reasons for power breakdowns and load shedding.
The KESC has proposed setting up a 350-MW gas-fuelled power project to remove at least half of the yawning deficit. Earlier, the utility had proposed acquiring a barge-mounted plant.
The idea was to set aside rules specified under the 2002 power policy, because the power crisis in the city demanded emergency measures. This plea, however, was turned down by the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority.
While Nepra is right in refusing to allow such a precedence to be set, the fact remains that Karachi faces an acute power crisis which needs to be tackled on an emergency basis. One wonders why nothing was done over the past years to obviate this shortfall through proper planning.
Despite the claims by the KESC's management about revamping the system and bringing down line losses, the ground reality seems to be different. Line losses, as has been repeatedly said, stand at 40 per cent, when the internationally accepted level is under 10 per cent.
The wastage of so much electricity is a national loss that needs to be checked. Part of the problem is the growth in power theft, especially through the 'kunda' system. The ultimate sufferers of this practice are the bill-paying power consumers, who endure frequent power cuts, fluctuations and low voltage.
If line losses are brought down on a war footing as well, the KESC will have enough power at its disposal to help bridge the gap. As things stand, power rates in Pakistan are one of the highest in the region.
Lower tariffs are needed for industrial units to make Pakistan's exports competitive in world markets. There is an equally urgent need to make power supply available to consumers at competitive rates. Both the KESC and the government need to put their heads together to achieve this objective.