Another Universal Children's Day has come and gone. But despite the lofty sentiments of the president and prime minister, who reaffirmed their commitment to the welfare of the most vulnerable section of society, we had nothing to show for the pledge we made to ourselves and the international community in 1990. That was the year when Pakistan ratified - with reservations that were later withdrawn - the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
From this basic document, Pakistan went on to sign other international agreements, dealing directly or indirectly with the state of its children, and took steps to institute national laws - the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance and Compulsory Primary Education Act for provinces among them.
While these have been welcome measures, what has been conspicuous by its absence is the implementation of the legal provisions. There has been no visible improvement in the lot of the children, and periodic reports by the state and independent organizations testify to this. Children remain at the receiving end of the stick in a number of areas.
They are forced to forego their rights to a decent education, and contribute instead to the family income through manual labour, much of it involving dangerous, backbreaking activity. Indeed, the number of child labourers in the country is thought to far exceed the official figures of 3.6 million - it is believed to be closer to nine million. While primary school enrolment has increased, the drop out rate has shown no signs of abating and has in fact risen
from 40 per cent in 1996-1997 to 54 per cent in 1999-2000.
One of the factors responsible for this is the corporal punishment meted out to schoolchildren. This is specially true of the madressahs where children are often brutally beaten. While these may be among the better known issues of child exploitation, what is, for cultural sensitivities, rarely focused upon is child trafficking, prostitution and sexual abuse.
Change cannot be expected overnight - the issue of child exploitation is too closely tied to poverty for it to be resolved without taking the larger national perspective into account. However, demonstration of some political will on the part of the government could go a long way in mobilizing public opinion about the rights of the child. For what is the good of signing international treaties and enacting laws if attitudes are not transformed and legislation not implemented? A more committed response to the problem would not be out of place at this juncture.