ISLAMABAD, Sept 17: Former prime minister Benazir Bhutto has questioned the legality of the announcement made by the government that President Gen Pervez Musharraf will continue as president and chief of army staff.

In a statement on Friday, the PPP chairperson said the military chiefs were part of the military bureaucracy, which was different from political administration. She said the vesting of military bureaucracy and political administration in one individual reflected a country without a constitution, political system, rules, laws or due process. "It boded ill for a nuclear country to be without a political system based on the rule of law."

She said the handpicked administration of Shaukat Aziz, in its first meeting on Wednesday, claimed that the constitution allowed a military chief to simultaneously hold the position of the president. It adversely affected the image of the armed forces, giving the wrong impression that none of the other officers were worthy of holding the post of army chief.

Ms Bhutto said it also reflected poorly on the international image of Pakistan as a country run by a military dictator. "It was a sad day for Pakistan that the military chief broke his solemn oath to the nation and the parliament to take off his uniform."

She said it was in the best national interest that the country moved onto the path of democracy. She maintained that resolution of social issues, including those of women's rights, literacy and health, rested with a democratic political system.

Following an agreement with the MMA, Gen Musharraf, in a nationally-televised speech on December 24, 2003, had said: "After giving it a serious thought, I have decided to give up my uniform before Dec 31, 2004 for creating political harmony in the country. I will select the date myself within this period".

Ms Bhutto noted that the retention of the office of army chief by the president would be violative of Article 244 of the Constitution, barring members of the armed forces from taking part in politics.

She said the real strength of the federation was in its proud 150 million people. To insist on relegating all power in one individual based on the strength of the army, as opposed to the Constitution, negated democratic principles and the very promise of good governance that Gen Musharraf had initially made.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...