Mr Richard Clarke's reaction to the findings of the 9/11 commission and his recommendations deserve to be taken note of. Writing in The New York Times, the former counter-terrorism chief has pleaded for a new American approach towards Muslim countries.
Specifically, he has advocated more economic aid and has called for the establishment of a pan-Islamic council consisting of ulema and secular leaders to promote the cause of political openness in the Islamic world.
More important, he has called for restarting the Arab-Israeli peace process. His plea should sound bizarre to those quarters in the Bush administration which have thoroughly bungled the war on terror and given it a turn that has proved counter-productive.
Even though Baghdad was not at all involved with 9/11 and did not possess weapons of mass destruction, policy-makers in Washington unleashed America's military might against Iraq.
In addition, not a day passes without someone in the Bush administration hurling threats against Syria and Iran - primarily for Israel's benefit in an election year. No wonder, America's standing in the Muslim world should be "low", as pointed out by Mr Clarke.
No issue has done more to identify the US with Israel in Muslim eyes than the Palestinian question, for Washington's support to Tel Aviv has been total. Pandering to the wishes of the powerful Zionist lobby in the US, American support to Israel has been based on expediency and has tended to ignore the moral and legal aspects of the Palestine question.
The issue in Palestine is the continued occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, including Al Quds. America lent support to Israel even when it violated the Oslo accords and reneged on its pledge to withdraw from occupied territories.
More astonishingly, President Bush has repudiated the new peace process he unveiled last April. He first declared that Israel would retain "some" land, and then he said that the year 2005 for the coming into being of a Palestinian state was unrealistic.
Unless America adopts a policy that is not overly pro-Israel, there will be little chance that the vast majority of Muslim masses will regard America as a friend.
Arrests in Gujrat
The arrest of four foreigners among 13 militants from a Gujrat city neighbourhood has added a new and worrying dimension to the threat posed by terrorists in the country.
This is the first time that militants have been spotted in a smaller Punjab town; earlier raids had apprehended such elements only in bigger cities like Lahore and Faisalabad.
The Punjab police have not revealed the nationalities of the arrested foreigners but it is believed that they are of Arab and African origin, and were sheltered by their Pakistani sympathizers. Holed up inside a house in Gujrat, they put up a 16-hour-long armed resistance before security forces were able to storm the house and make arrests.
That the militants were living in Pakistan with their families, including women and children, and the fact that they relocated to Gujrat some six weeks ago from a tribal area, should also raise serious questions about the destinations of those fleeing, for instance, the on-going military action in South Waziristan.
Intelligence about the movement of people crossing over from the tribal belt obviously needs to be stepped up. The government should also make a greater effort to inform and warn the people about the possible presence of militants in their immediate neighbourhoods.
The warning must extend to those who may otherwise, and perhaps innocently, rent out their houses or vehicles to such elements. The government, like its Saudi counterpart, should also consider a general amnesty for all foreigners living illegally in Pakistan, and urge them to come forward and register themselves with the authorities concerned.
The Gujrat incident should serve as a warning for necessary precautions about the presence of terrorist elements, both local and foreign, in the country.