Bush visit unlikely to help US: media

Published November 30, 2003

WASHINGTON, Nov 29: President George W. Bush’s secret visit to Iraq on Thanksgiving holiday will raise his standing close to the 2004 elections but will do little to improve America’s image in Iraq, US newspapers and political commentators said on Saturday.

Mr Bush’s admirers argued that the surprise visit has increased America’s image across the world.

Critics disagreed. They described the trip as a magnificent public relation exercise but said there’s little else to rationalize risking the life of the president and those accompanying him.

“Let the chips fall where they may,” National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said of potential criticism that the trip was politically motivated.

Ms Rice, who accompanied the president, insisted that the public would view Mr Bush’s trip as a worthy act by the president, not a political move.

The Chicago Tribune said the trip was “a blunt reminder to (the opposition) Democrats hoping to challenge Mr Bush, of just how much power a president has to shape the agenda.”

“It’s a reminder of the fact that it’s hard to match the president of the United States for drawing attention to himself,” Andrew Kohut, director of a prestigious think-tank, the Pew Research Center, told the Tribune.

“In a single day, Mr Bush did much to steer the images of Iraq — at least in the short term — away from the daily US casualties and instead to the cheering troops recommitting themselves to a mission some soldiers have openly criticized,” the newspaper said.

The New York Times reported from Baghdad that the visit has had little impact on the ordinary Iraqis. “Many Iraqis — though they gave Mr Bush and Mrs Hilary Clinton points for bravery — said their visits were irrelevant. The measure for them, unlike for the American soldiers who seemed buoyed by the visits, was whether life here would change as a result,” the newspaper said.

“We don’t care about visits like this,” Nuha Hassan, 33, a mother of three told NYT. “What we care about is whether there is electricity, about whether we can send our children to school without worrying.”

“Still, the novelty value, especially of Mr. Bush’s swoop into Iraq, was high,” the newspaper noted.

Howard Dean, a Democrat hoping to challenge Mr. Bush in the 2004 election, said the visit will not change the fact that those brave men and women (US soldiers) should never have been fighting in Iraq in the first place.”

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...