August 22, 2003	Friday	Jumadi-us-Sani 23, 1424

Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

LONDON, Aug 21: Iraq weapons expert David Kelly had predicted his death six months ago, telling a British diplomat that if Baghdad was attacked he would be found “dead in the woods,” the inquiry into his death revealed on Thursday.

The premonition was recounted at the investigation into the suicide of Kelly, sucked into the heart of a row over whether Prime Minister Tony Blair’s inner circle hyped evidence about Iraq’s weapons capability to win support for the war.

David Kelly, a former Iraq weapons inspector whose body was found in woodlands near his home last month, told diplomat David Broucher in February he advised Iraqi officials that if they cooperated with the inspectors “they would have nothing to fear.”

“The implication was if the invasion went ahead, that would make him a liar and he would have betrayed his contacts, some of whom might be killed as a result of his actions,” Mr Broucher told the inquiry probing the death of the weapons expert.

Mr Broucher said he asked Kelly what would happen if Iraq were attacked. “His reply was ... ‘I will be found dead in the woods.’”

“I thought he might have meant that he was at risk of being attacked by the Iraqis in some way,” Broucher said.

But he added that Kelly believed that the invasion “might go ahead anyway and that somehow this put him in a morally ambiguous position”.

Mr Broucher said Kelly, who was the source for a BBC reporter’s accusations that Blair’s government “sexed up” a dossier making the case for war, believed British intelligence services had come under pressure to produce compelling evidence.

The most dramatic section of the September dossier said Saddam had chemical and biological weapons that could be unleashed within 45 minutes.

But Broucher said Kelly, a microbiologist and biological weapons specialist, appeared unconvinced.

Broucher also said Kelly told him the deadly poisons “would be kept separately from the munitions and that this meant that the weapons could not be used quickly”.—Reuters