KARACHI, June 27: The Pakistan People’s Party has termed the $3 billion economic package announced by the United States “peanuts” and maintained that it would not bring any relief to the people of Pakistan.

PPP information secretary Taj Haider said the package would make the military more strong as compared to democratic institutions in Pakistan, said a statement issued on Friday.

He said the package was also intended to protect long-term interests of the United States in Afghanistan, Iraq and against Iran and regretted that the Bush administration did not express concern over the state of democratic and constitutional dispensation in the country.

Mr Haider said President Bush’s attitude was regrettable especially when the rest of the Western world, including the European Union and the Commonwealth, had expressed strong reservations on the situation in Pakistan.

Mr Haider recalled a Centcom report according to which Pakistan had suffered a loss of $10 billion since 9/11.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...