Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

June 29, 2002 Saturday Rabi-us-Sani 17, 1423

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




4 transferred for pointing out use of poor material



By Our Correspondent


GUJRAT, June 28: Two SDOs and as many overseers of the highways department, who had raised objections over the use of unapproved and substandard material in three road projects, had been transferred during the last 50 days, a source said on Friday.

He said SDO Ejaz Gill was transferred for pointing out corruption and Kharian SDO Iqbal Sukhera was given the additional charge of the post. Later, Mr Sukhera was ordered to relinquish the additional charge which was given to Sarai Alamgir SDO, he said.

Similarly, two overseers were transferred, he said. However, the motive behind the transfer of district officer (roads) could not be known, he added.

EDO’S VERSION: When contacted EDO (highways) Chaudhry Shafi said the projects had been given to the construction company on merit. He denied any anomaly by his department and the construction company.

He said he was satisfied with the material which was being used by the construction company.

When asked about the transfer of the officials, he said it was a routine matter.

COUNCILLOR’S PLEA: Six councillors, including three women, have urged the district Nazim to take note of the use of substandard material in the development schemes in union council No 57.

In a joint statement issued here, councillors Hanif Haidery, Ihsan Butt, Shan Bhatti, Zakia Rizvi, Mahmooda Mughal and Dr Shazia, alleged that the contractors were being patronized by UC Nazim Mehr Salim.

They claimed that a contractor, Riasat Ali, a close associate of the Nazim, had received full payment of Rs200,000 from the tehsil municipal though the scheme, construction of Ziaul Islam street, is still to be completed.

They claimed that municipal SDO Mehr Ashraf did not take any action against the contractors involved in anomalies.

They urged the district Nazim and the DCO to order an impartial inquiry into the matter.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005