Greater Thal Canal controversy
By Nadeem Saeed
AMONG all the Seraiki parties, only the Pakistan Seraiki Party, led by Taj Muhammad Langah, is supporting the Greater Thal Canal project.
PSP had been part of the Pakistan Oppressed Nations Movement since its formation. But, the movement’s Seraikistan unit chairman Hameed Asghar Shaheen expelled PSP from Ponm over its stand on GTC and the referendum. PSP had opted to support the presidential referendum of April 30 last.
Matters came to a heed when an Islamabad-based NGO organized a seminar in Multan recently on the GTC project and invited Sindhi and Seraiki political leaders, intellectuals and journalists to express their viewpoint on the subject. Only the PSP spoke in favour of GTC. As expected, Sindhi delegates expressed resentment over the decision to go ahead with the project despite opposition.
Hameed Aghar Shaheen of the Seraikistan Qaumi Movement, M.A. Bhutta of the Seraiki National Party and Mansoor Karim Siyal of the Seraiki Qaumi Inqalabi Party were of the view that the demand of the Seraiki people was for a federating unit of their own.
Mr Siyal said it was rather astonishing that the Punjab establishment was imposing a Rs30 billion project on the Seraiki people. He said Thal had never been the part of the Indus delta and, therefore, irrigating it by depriving Sindhis of their share would be a sheer injustice.
Noted people of Thal, including Prof. Akram Mirani, Asholal Faqir, Ustad Ijaz and Mazhar Nawaz, said the limited success of the Thal canal that flowed through the lesser part of the desert called Thal Jhandi did not mean that GTC, which had to flow through the greater part of the desert called Thal Kalaan, would also work. They said the residents of Thal were happy with the natural pattern the desert offered to them. They said cattle rearing was their major occupation while in fall they just sprinkled the gram seed and got a rich crop without any effort.
A resident of Thal said if the Punjab establishment was so adamant to give the Seraiki area a gigantic project like GTC, it should also give lands in the command area to the people of Thal at the rate they were allotted to the civil and military bureaucracy and judges. “Will the Punjab bureaucracy like to surrender lands in favour of the locals?” he questioned.
Taj Langah later addressed a press conference and vowed to rename the Indus as ‘Seraiku’ river if the Sindhis kept on claiming sole proprietary rights on its water. This proved to be the last straw for Seraiki organizations which condemned Langah for what they called his growing fascist tendencies. They said the river Indus gave birth to one of the ancient civilizations in the history of mankind which had been attributed to its name.
In its rejoinder, PSP termed its critics ‘simple’ and socially backward. Though it claimed that no-one could expel PSP from Ponm, it mentioned in detail the party’s differences with the alliance’s leadership.
In recent times, PSP and its policies have been the subject of internal criticism as well. As a result, stalwarts like Aslam Rasoolpuri, Mehmood Nizami, Mansoor Karim Siyal, Abid Jhangla and Abdul Sattar Thahim have left the party.
Whether GTC is beneficial for the people of Thal is not clear but the controversy over it has landed Mr. Langah in hot waters of criticism.

