PESHAWAR, June 12: A two-member bench of the Peshawar High Court on Tuesday summoned the director general of Pakistan Sports Board (PSB), Brig Saulat Abbas, in a contempt of court petition charging him of violating the court’s order.

The bench comprising Justice Malik Hamid Saeed and Justice Abdur Rauf Lughmani directed that the DG should appear on June 18 and file his reply before that date.

The bench took exception to the continuous non-compliance of the court’s order and asked the respondents counsel why action should not be taken against them under the contempt of court law.

The bench observed that if the director general of FIA was interested in becoming president of the Pakistan Badminton Federation (PBF) it did not mean that the court’s order should be flouted. The petition was filed by Dr. Saeedul Majeed, a former president of PBF.

Advocate Mubashir Ali appeared for the petitioner and contended that despite furnishing numerous undertakings to the high  court the respondent (DG) had been violating those commitments.

According to facts of the case the elections of PBF were held on Dec 31, 2000 after the tenure of Mohib Asad, the DG of FIA, ended as president of the federation. Dr Saeedul Majeed was elected the president in those elections.

However, the DG, PSB, declared the elections null and void following which a writ petition was filed Dr Majeed in the Peshawar High Court.

The petition was disposed of after the DG, deputy director, Muhammad Asghar and others furnished undertakings that fresh elections would be held. The court directed them to hold polls with changing the number of members and amending the constitution of the federation.

Later on, the respondents filed an application before the high court requesting for modification of the earlier order of the high court to the extent that they should be allowed to amend the constitution and number of members.

However, the court turned down that plea against which the respondents filed leave to appeal petition before the Supreme Court, which has yet to be taken up for hearing.

In the meantime the respondent issued a circular on April 8 in which it was announced that elections would be held on April 15.

However, on April 13 the said circular was withdrawn. The petitioner filed the instant contempt application, praying the court to take action against the respondents under the contempt of court law.

Advocate Irfanullah Qureshi, appearing for the DG, requested the court to allow some time to them as the leave to appeal petition had been pending before the Supreme Court. The bench observed that unless the apex court had not suspended the orders of the high court the respondents had to obey the court order.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...