Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

June 1, 2002 Saturday Rabi-ul-Awwal 19,1423

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Hashmi’s plea for case transfer dismissed



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, May 31: The supreme court on Friday dismissed the petition by Makhdoom Javed Hashmi, imprisoned PML(N) acting president, demanding the transfer of his case to some other accountability court.

Javed Hashmi was arrested by the NAB in November 2001 after PML(N), headed by him, had launched a public contact campaign. The prosecution has alleged that his assets were beyond his known sources of income.

He had approached the supreme court through senior advocate Akram Sheikh that his case should be transferred to some other accountability court, as he had no hope of getting justice from the accountability court headed by Judge Rana Abdul Ghafar Khan.

The SC bench consisting of Justice Munir A. Sheikh, Justice Qazi Farooq and Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar, after hearing Akram Sheikh and advocate Mohammad Afzal Siddiqui, NAB counsel, refused to accept Javed Hashmi’s petition.

The petitioner’s counsel stated that accountability court was prejudiced against his client and was proceeding under NAB’s directives.

The accountability court, he stated, was extending his client’s remand without justification. He said that judge never asked the prosecution the reasons for extension of remand.

Advocate Afzal Siddiqui, representing the NAB, stated that objections regarding grant of remand were not valid and it was a routine practice.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005