Elevation of judges challenged

Published February 10, 2002

ISLAMABAD, Feb 9: The recent elevation of judges to the Supreme Court was challenged on Saturday through a petition in the apex court with a prayer to examine at least two of the four appointments.

The four judges elevated to the Supreme Court on Dec 12, 2001, were: Peshawar High Court Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Raza Khan and Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday, Justice Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi and Justice Faqir Mohammad Khokhar from the Lahore High Court.

Petitioner Rai Mohammad Nawaz Kharal has sought a declaration from the SC that two of the elevations were invalid.

A senior court official endorsed that the petition had been filed.

The petitioner has also offered his candidature under Article 177 (2b) of the constitution, stating that he, like other senior advocates having 15 years of practice, was entitled to be considered for appointment as judge of the court.

The appointments have caused frustration and disappointment in the legal fraternity, he claimed.

The elevation of senior lawyers as SC judges, the petitioner contended, was in line with the scheme of the constitution and the principles enunciated in the 1996 Al-Jehad Trust case and 1998 Malik Asad Ali case.

He pleaded that former chief justice Irshad Hasan Khan could only recommend two appointments, therefore the other two of his appointments fell out of his powers, as pronounced by the court.

The petitioner contended that at the time when the appointments were announced, two vacancies existed in the SC, because of the retirement of Justice Abdul Rehman Khan and Justice Rashid Aziz Khan.

The four appointments prima facie were made to cover the two existing vacancies and the then prospective retirement of Chief Justice Irshad Hasan Khan on Jan 5 and Justice Mohammad Arif on Jan 9.

The petitioner contended that former chief justice, Mohammad Bashir Jehangiri, who was appointed the CJ after the retirement of Justice Irshad Hasan, was not consulted though two vacancies fell vacant during his tenure.

The petitioner contended that it had become a tendency of the federation, one of the respondents, to ignore advocates when appointing the SC judges.

The petitioner has named 21 respondents in the petition, including the federation, the four judges, Supreme Court Bar Association, Pakistan Bar Council and all the bar councils in the country.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...