Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition


January 15, 2002 Tuesday Shawwal 30, 1422

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.


Letters







To send a letter to the Editor
Click here




Mohammad Ali Jauher and the Turks
The unkindest cut of all
What to be proud of?
Abandoning our captive citizens
Committee on Kashmir
Long-distance calls
PTCL customer services
Executive and judiciary
Any critics around?
MSF work in refugee camps
ISI bashing in the press
Role of the union councils
Pensioners’ woes



Mohammad Ali Jauher and the Turks


IN THE course of his extremely interesting comments on Maulana Mohammad Ali (Dawn Metropolitan Jan, 9), Ariel raises the question why, in his article on ‘Choice of the Turks’, Mohammad Ali did not back the idea of the Turks joining the Germans in World War I and recommended neutrality. The fact is that, given the unthinking fanaticism of the Khilafatists, Indian Muslims had far too many misconceptions about this and their hero Enver Pasha.

Surprisingly, Turkish opinion, including that of the Committee of Union and Progress, the ‘Young Turks’, was solidly pro-British. When the war broke out, the Turks tried very hard to persuade the Allies to let Turkey join them! The Allies did not want this because that would justify a German attack on Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, which the Turks could not defend. That would then risk the Russian Black Sea fleet being bottled up. The Allies, therefore, tried very