KARACHI, Oct 22: The Sindh High Court on Monday allowed a petition pertaining to custody of wards to the extent that impugned judgement was set aside and the appeal was remanded back to the first appellate court (ADJ court).

Justice Sabihuddin Ahmed observed that since it was an old case, the appellate court should decide the matter within six months.

While deciding the matter, Justice Ahmed took exception to the stance of the AAG, Sindh, who had opposed the petition, and cautioned him not to disregard judgments of the Supreme Court.

AAG Suleman Habibullah had questioned maintainability of the constitutional petition filed by one Syed Hasan Zia Rizvi impugning an order passed by former ADJ Qazi Allah Bux.

Justice Sabihuddin Ahmed then asked that whether the learned the AAG is mindful of a case law in which a judgement was delivered against Utility Stores Corporation and said that judicial and quasi judicial actions are covered under this article.

Earlier, Syed Iqbal Haider, appearing for the petitioner referred to orders by different courts of law and said that respondent Farhat Hasan has frustrated the writ of law and despite notices she never attended the proceedings nor allowed petitioner who is father of three children to visit or meet his children. He said the trial court/family court judge ordered that the custody of the children be handed over to the father but ADJ Qazi Allah Buksh in 1998 suspended the order and also the family court judge.

The petitioner then moved a constitutional petition which was decided on Tuesday. AAG Suleman Habibullah opposed the petition and said under no law appellate court can be given a specific direction as prayed by the counsel for petitioner (presence of respondent Farhat and her three children at hearing of appeal)

Counsel for the petitioner, Syed Iqbal Haider submitted that when a wife deserts her husband, she looses the right of custody automatically but without going into the merits of the case, the right of father to visit his children can never be taken away, submitted Syed Iqbal Haider, counsel for petitioner.

The bench, after hearing both the sides, allowed the petition to the extent that the impugned judgement was set aside and the appeal was remanded back to the first appellate court (ADJ court).

BAIL: Another bench of SHC comprising Justice Ghulam Nabi Soomro dismissed a bail application as withdrawn.

Mehmood Alam Rizvi advocate, counsel for applicant Junaid Iqbal informed the bench that the trial court had framed charge and he would be satisfied if the trial court is directed to proceed with the case as expeditiously as possible.

The applicant is facing trial in a dacoity case registered by Saddar Police.

The same bench granted bail to an applicant Sohail Yaqoob against a surety of Rs100,000 and personal bond in the like amount.

The applicant was booked by New Karachi police in an armed dacoity case.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...